This is the final product of my poem visualization. The poem is about a dream that a pianist has one night, so I wanted the poem to seem dream-esque. I did this by hanging picture frames from the hall 'ceiling' thing. A normal book format would not have as accurately accomplished a dream-esque essence of the piece. I also chose to use picture frames because each 'scene' or line seemed like a frame to me. It did not all run together but rather, it seemed broken into frames.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Poem Visualization
This is the final product of my poem visualization. The poem is about a dream that a pianist has one night, so I wanted the poem to seem dream-esque. I did this by hanging picture frames from the hall 'ceiling' thing. A normal book format would not have as accurately accomplished a dream-esque essence of the piece. I also chose to use picture frames because each 'scene' or line seemed like a frame to me. It did not all run together but rather, it seemed broken into frames.
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Independence: Breaking the Restraints and Limitations of the Physical World
THEIR Collaborative Presentations
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Maquette? Like a Baguette?
No, a Maquette is not like a Baguette, Mom. In fact, a Maquette isn't even edible.
Monday, April 19, 2010
The Marionettes of Distant Masters
The Marionettes of Distant Masters
Russell Edson
A pianist dreams that he's hired by a wrecking company to
ruin a piano with his fingers . . .
On the day of the piano wrecking concert, as he's
dressing, he notices a butterfly annoying a flower in his window
box. He wonders if the police should be called. Then he thinks
maybe the butterfly is just a marionette being manipulated by
its master from the window above.
Suddenly everything is beautiful. He begins to cry.
Then another butterfly begins to annoy the first butterfly.
He again wonders if he shouldn't call the police.
But, perhaps they are marionette-butterflies? He thinks
they are, belonging to rival masters seeing whose butterfly can
annoy the other's the most.
And this is happening in his window box. The Cosmic
Plan: Distant Masters manipulating minor Masters who, in turn,
are manipulating tiny butterfly-Masters who, in turn, are
manipulating him . . . A universe webbed with strings!
Suddenly it is all so beautiful; the light is strange . . .
Something about the light! He begins to cry . . .
This is the poem I intend to use for the artist book/poem visualization. I found this poem after a long search through contemporary poets. It was difficult for me to decide between Russell Edson and W.D. Snodgrass. Both poets had spectacular poems that would have been great to visualize. I chose this poem because I had the most peculiar "vision" while reading it.
When I read something, it is very easy for me to "vision" the text. For instance, fictional novels work as movies for me in my mind. It is spectacular, really. I have my own motion pictures while I read books. This happens better during some book.
The "scenes" I pictured while I was reading the poems were all very different. I chose this poem because the scene I was able to see was spectacular. It was an art in itself. A rush of a million project ideas came to my head. I love the idea of marionettes. There is something youthful and energetic about them. Better yet, the idea of two warring Master Marionetteers was enthralling.
I will have fun creating the piece for this poem. I intend to make it hand from the ceiling. I'd like to keep the rest a surprise.
Whitney Biennial Artist Comparison
Robert Williams and Charles Ray were two featured artists at the Whitney Biennial.They were not featured near eachother in the museum, but they were two pieces I noted and found interesting when I put them side by side on my laptop desktop. Ray’s “Untitled” was exhibited with a series of other works very similar. The works were either flowers, trees, or “garden-esque” subjects. He did not feature and real “foreign object;” each work was relatively recognizable. I could relate to the piece beacuse I was so familiar with the subject matter. He uses vibrant colors and colors that work in complimentary fashions (not in the sense that they were “opposite colors,” but they complimented each other). I loved seeing the series of works taking over the room. It was an explosion of colorful flowers and trees. It felt like a delft garden to me. I enjoyed his work.
Robert Williams’s work, “Astrophysically Modified Real Estate” was fantastic as well. I loved the series of works displayed on the wall. They were humerous and honestly reminded me of some of the sketches of a friend of mine. The ideas were impossible and rather absured. I love peculiarities. This artist certainly fit my taste. Like Ray’s work, the subjects of his pieces were recognizable. There is nothing outlandish about houses and real estate and cul-de-sacs. Each thing is very recognizible, like in Ray’s work. Also similar to Ray’s work, their pieces came in a sort of series. Ray’s work were featured in a room, taking up much space. Williams’s came in a series as well... but on a much smaller scale. Also, the medium of the artists work seemed “relateable.” Ray’s flowers seemed to be colored by markers, which evoke a sort of reminescence of kindergarten when I always drew multi-colored daisies. Williams’s works also evoked a sort of reminiscence, as their medium is a simple watercolor on paper. Watercolor was a common medium for me as a kindergartner and yound elementrary student. I could relate very well to to pieces of both artists through their medium
Their works are also very different. First of all, the scale of their works differ in that Ray worked rather large scale, with his “Untitled” at 47 x 32 1/2 inches, and Williams’s work at 36,8 x 44.5 centimeters. Color is also a great difference. Williams’s works have a soft coloration to them. He uses primarily neutral tones with no unusual colorations for the objects in his work. Ray uses a breadth of colors in his flowers. In nature, Daisies with a different color for each petal are likely non-existant. His colorations are unusual and not representative of the colors of flowers in real life.
I really enjoyed the simplistic works of these two artists. They’ll definitely go in my “faves” folder.
Word Visualization: HYPER AND STRESSED
Monday, April 5, 2010
Me, in Three
triptych, before the final product.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Illustrator
Monday, March 15, 2010
Let's Do Coffee
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Marina Abramović's portraits contained so many different emotions. The way she captivated feeling and emotion made her portraits seem alive, rather than a stagnant representation of an individual, mostly herself. I particularly enjoyed her black-and-white portraits. The rather eerie settings she used made the portraits alluring and thought provoking. Her other words had very direct statements being made about women. Her work with the woman in the kitchen and the other of the woman amongst children in uniforms were particularly interesting to me. The way she captures the individual's face seems particularly important in her work.
Frida Kahlo's portraits, while very unique, displayed similar emotions. The medium is clearly different, as Kahlo used canvas and paint instead of photography. Many of the portraits involve a sort of solemn feel, or a sort of distress. This particular piece seems less emotional at first, when you first consider the coloration. Once you realize that the meaning of the picture on her forehead symbolizes her thoughts about death, you quickly reconsider your primary thoughts on the piece. I found the emotions behind this piece were related to the emotions behind Abramovic's pieces. I felt, distressed.
Cui Xiuwen's works were quite different from the other artists. Xiuwen's works seemed to had a recurring theme about them, with the young girls who looked very similar, with the white dresses and black hair. I usually like variety in an artists's portfolio, but I must say that I really enjoyed Xiuwen's common theme with the similar looking girls (who may actually be the same girls). Again, the idea I gathered was distress. Between the three artists, the most prevalent similarity (besides the fact that each artists works were based on femininity) is the repeated emotion of distress. Distress does not always as a "heavy" emotion. None of the works seemed particularly light hearted and positive.